Violence vs. Nonviolence: Reflections on EDSA and Current Political Dynamics

 

Violence vs. Nonviolence: Reflections on EDSA and Current Political Dynamics

(Myke Ian A. Hechanova)

  Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, called "ahimsa," is based on the belief that not using violence is the most powerful way to bring about change. He taught that standing up against unfair laws peacefully, known as civil disobedience, is essential. "Satyagraha," or "truth force," means sticking to your beliefs without resorting to violence. 

    Gandhi believed in loving and understanding everyone, even those who oppress you, because this can help create real change. His methods were key to India's fight for independence, especially during events like the Salt March in 1930. His ideas inspired leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela in their battles against racism. 

    Today, Gandhi's approach still influences movements around the world, showing us how peaceful protests and open dialogue can lead to stronger communities and help break the cycle of violence.

    The influence of Gandhi’s philosophy is evident in the People Power Revolution, also known as the EDSA Revolution, in the Philippines. This nonviolent movement arose in response to the dictatorship of President Ferdinand Marcos, as Filipinos sought to free themselves from the shackles of oppression. Approximately two million people, including political, military, and religious groups, gathered at EDSA to voice their desire for liberation and the restoration of democracy.

    This event demonstrated that change is indeed possible through nonviolent means. The quest for independence resonates with everyone facing various forms of bondage, paralleling Gandhi’s principles of nonviolence. Ultimately, the EDSA Revolution succeeded without bloodshed, showcasing the effectiveness of nonviolent action in achieving political change, much like Gandhi's impact in India.

    History teaches us not to repeat past mistakes; this is its truest essence. However, it often appears that we fail to learn from it, instead tolerating and even perpetuating the same errors. The difference now is that the people themselves are the main actors in this recurring narrative.

    In the future, it is possible that a similar movement will emerge—not as a direct replica of EDSA, but as a revival that awakens the hearts and minds of Filipinos who may be swayed by opposing narratives of truth. While everyone may hold a subjective version of truth, the challenge lies in identifying those who present objective truth, supported by evidence and credibility. As long as this truth is communicated persuasively and through nonviolent means, the underlying principles of Gandhi’s philosophy can guide the way forward.